Gun FelonyFirearm law encyclopedia

Gun Felony entry

Bianchi v. Brown: Gun Law Case Guide

Last reviewed: 2026-08-28Topic: Court Cases & Sentencing
Quick answer

The en banc Fourth Circuit upheld Maryland’s prohibition on specified military-style semiautomatic rifles, concluding that the challenged weapons fell outside the Second Amendment’s protection and that the law also fit a historical tradition of regulating especially dangerous weapons.

Bianchi v. Brown is one of the major modern court decisions shaping firearm regulation, prohibited-person law, Second Amendment analysis, or federal firearm sentencing.

Court U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, en banc
Decision date August 6, 2024
Citation 111 F.4th 438 (4th Cir. 2024)
Main issue Maryland ban on specified semiautomatic assault-style rifles
Current status Binding in the Fourth Circuit unless superseded by later Supreme Court review or legislation.

What the court held

The en banc Fourth Circuit upheld Maryland’s prohibition on specified military-style semiautomatic rifles, concluding that the challenged weapons fell outside the Second Amendment’s protection and that the law also fit a historical tradition of regulating especially dangerous weapons.

Why Bianchi v. Brown matters

Bianchi is a leading post-Bruen appellate decision sustaining a state assault-weapon prohibition.

What the case does not automatically mean

A major firearm decision should not be reduced to “all gun laws are invalid” or “every person with a felony may possess a gun.” Constitutional challenges are often facial or as-applied, statutory decisions can be narrower than constitutional decisions, and lower-court holdings are binding only within their jurisdiction. Always identify the exact statute and court before applying the holding.

Felony gun charge and restoration impact

For a person researching a felony gun charge, the practical question is whether this case changes the elements, constitutional validity, sentencing exposure, or interpretation of the relevant firearm statute. Restoration remains a separate question. Review the gun-rights restoration guide, the state law page, and the § 922(g) guide.

How this fits into the current court split

Since Bruen and Rahimi, courts have produced a large body of new firearm decisions involving felony convictions, controlled-substance users, domestic-violence orders, age limits, carry restrictions, ghost guns, and ACCA sentencing. Compare this case with the full 25 major gun-law court cases library before drawing a nationwide conclusion.

Frequently asked questions

What did Bianchi v. Brown change about gun law?

Bianchi is a leading post-Bruen appellate decision sustaining a state assault-weapon prohibition.

Does Bianchi v. Brown mean a felon can own a gun?

Not as a blanket rule. The holding must be applied within its court, facts and issue. Federal § 922(g)(1), state law, and any legally effective restoration remain separate questions.

How does Bianchi v. Brown affect felony gun rights restoration?

Court decisions can change whether a firearm prohibition is constitutional or how a statute is interpreted, but restoration is a distinct statutory or executive process. A favorable case does not automatically create a restoration order.

Is Bianchi v. Brown still current law?

Binding in the Fourth Circuit unless superseded by later Supreme Court review or legislation.

Sources and legal references