Gun FelonyFirearm law encyclopedia

Gun Felony entry

Range v. Attorney General: Gun Law Case Guide

Last reviewed: 2026-08-28Topic: Court Cases & Sentencing
Quick answer

The en banc Third Circuit held that the government had not shown a historical tradition sufficient to disarm Range based on his particular nonviolent food-stamp fraud conviction.

Range v. Attorney General is one of the major modern court decisions shaping firearm regulation, prohibited-person law, Second Amendment analysis, or federal firearm sentencing.

Court U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, en banc
Decision date December 23, 2024
Citation 124 F.4th 218 (3d Cir. 2024)
Main issue As-applied § 922(g)(1) challenge based on an old nonviolent fraud offense
Current status Binding within the Third Circuit on its facts; it does not create a blanket rule that every nonviolent felon may possess firearms.

What the court held

The en banc Third Circuit held that the government had not shown a historical tradition sufficient to disarm Range based on his particular nonviolent food-stamp fraud conviction.

Why Range v. Attorney General matters

Range is the most prominent appellate decision granting an as-applied Second Amendment challenge to § 922(g)(1), and it stands in tension with several other circuits.

What the case does not automatically mean

A major firearm decision should not be reduced to “all gun laws are invalid” or “every person with a felony may possess a gun.” Constitutional challenges are often facial or as-applied, statutory decisions can be narrower than constitutional decisions, and lower-court holdings are binding only within their jurisdiction. Always identify the exact statute and court before applying the holding.

Felony gun charge and restoration impact

For a person researching a felony gun charge, the practical question is whether this case changes the elements, constitutional validity, sentencing exposure, or interpretation of the relevant firearm statute. Restoration remains a separate question. Review the gun-rights restoration guide, the state law page, and the § 922(g) guide.

How this fits into the current court split

Since Bruen and Rahimi, courts have produced a large body of new firearm decisions involving felony convictions, controlled-substance users, domestic-violence orders, age limits, carry restrictions, ghost guns, and ACCA sentencing. Compare this case with the full 25 major gun-law court cases library before drawing a nationwide conclusion.

Frequently asked questions

What did Range v. Attorney General change about gun law?

Range is the most prominent appellate decision granting an as-applied Second Amendment challenge to § 922(g)(1), and it stands in tension with several other circuits.

Does Range v. Attorney General mean a felon can own a gun?

Not as a blanket rule. The holding must be applied within its court, facts and issue. Federal § 922(g)(1), state law, and any legally effective restoration remain separate questions.

How does Range v. Attorney General affect felony gun rights restoration?

Court decisions can change whether a firearm prohibition is constitutional or how a statute is interpreted, but restoration is a distinct statutory or executive process. A favorable case does not automatically create a restoration order.

Is Range v. Attorney General still current law?

Binding within the Third Circuit on its facts; it does not create a blanket rule that every nonviolent felon may possess firearms.

Sources and legal references