Gun FelonyFirearm law encyclopedia

Gun Felony entry

Wolford v. Lopez: Gun Law Case Guide

Last reviewed: 2026-08-28Topic: Court Cases & Sentencing
Quick answer

The Court held that Hawaii could not make licensed concealed carry presumptively unlawful on private property open to the public unless the owner gave express authorization.

Wolford v. Lopez is one of the major modern court decisions shaping firearm regulation, prohibited-person law, Second Amendment analysis, or federal firearm sentencing.

Court U.S. Supreme Court
Decision date June 25, 2026
Citation 609 U.S. ___ (2026)
Main issue Licensed concealed carry on private property open to the public
Current status Controlling Supreme Court precedent issued June 25, 2026.

What the court held

The Court held that Hawaii could not make licensed concealed carry presumptively unlawful on private property open to the public unless the owner gave express authorization.

Why Wolford v. Lopez matters

Wolford is a major post-Bruen decision about the boundary between public carry rights and private-property rules. It does not eliminate an owner’s right to exclude firearms from private property.

What the case does not automatically mean

A major firearm decision should not be reduced to “all gun laws are invalid” or “every person with a felony may possess a gun.” Constitutional challenges are often facial or as-applied, statutory decisions can be narrower than constitutional decisions, and lower-court holdings are binding only within their jurisdiction. Always identify the exact statute and court before applying the holding.

Felony gun charge and restoration impact

For a person researching a felony gun charge, the practical question is whether this case changes the elements, constitutional validity, sentencing exposure, or interpretation of the relevant firearm statute. Restoration remains a separate question. Review the gun-rights restoration guide, the state law page, and the § 922(g) guide.

How this fits into the current court split

Since Bruen and Rahimi, courts have produced a large body of new firearm decisions involving felony convictions, controlled-substance users, domestic-violence orders, age limits, carry restrictions, ghost guns, and ACCA sentencing. Compare this case with the full 25 major gun-law court cases library before drawing a nationwide conclusion.

Frequently asked questions

What did Wolford v. Lopez change about gun law?

Wolford is a major post-Bruen decision about the boundary between public carry rights and private-property rules. It does not eliminate an owner’s right to exclude firearms from private property.

Does Wolford v. Lopez mean a felon can own a gun?

Not as a blanket rule. The holding must be applied within its court, facts and issue. Federal § 922(g)(1), state law, and any legally effective restoration remain separate questions.

How does Wolford v. Lopez affect felony gun rights restoration?

Court decisions can change whether a firearm prohibition is constitutional or how a statute is interpreted, but restoration is a distinct statutory or executive process. A favorable case does not automatically create a restoration order.

Is Wolford v. Lopez still current law?

Controlling Supreme Court precedent issued June 25, 2026.

Sources and legal references