GunFelony.comFirearm law encyclopedia

GunFelony.com entry

Federal Gun Law Changes and Updates

Last reviewed: 2026-08-28
Quick answer

The biggest current restoration development is DOJ’s August 17, 2026 final § 925(c) rule. Separately, Sentencing Commission amendments adopted in 2026 are scheduled for a November 1, 2026 effective date, while 2025 Amendment 834 is already in effect.

This page tracks major federal developments affecting prohibited-person firearm law, sentencing and firearm-rights restoration.

August 17, 2026 — DOJ finalizes § 925(c) restoration process

DOJ announced a final rule establishing a functioning Federal Firearm Rights Restoration program. DOJ describes a staged rollout beginning with invited applicants on September 25, 2026, followed by a first public application window on November 4, 2026.

2026 — Sentencing guideline amendments adopted for November 1 effective date

The U.S. Sentencing Commission submitted amendments to Congress on April 30, 2026 and specified November 1, 2026 as the effective date absent congressional action. Researchers should distinguish adopted future amendments from the guideline manual currently in effect.

November 1, 2025 — Amendment 834 becomes effective

Amendment 834 revised §2K2.1 to address machinegun conversion devices with tiered specific offense characteristics and related conforming changes.

June 21, 2024 — United States v. Rahimi

The Supreme Court upheld application of § 922(g)(8) to the respondent and clarified that Bruen requires a historical analogue rather than a historical twin. Litigation over other § 922(g) categories continues.

Frequently asked questions

What is the newest federal gun-rights restoration change?

DOJ announced a final Federal Firearm Rights Restoration rule on August 17, 2026 under 18 U.S.C. § 925(c).

Are the 2026 sentencing guideline amendments in effect yet?

The Sentencing Commission specifies November 1, 2026 as the effective date absent congressional action. As of August 28, 2026, that effective date is in the future.

What did Rahimi change?

Rahimi addressed § 922(g)(8) and clarified the historical-analogue framework. It did not resolve every constitutional question involving § 922(g)(1).

Sources and legal references